Dr Anne McCloskey and Alisa: The Justice Bill and Public Health Bill: Tyrannical twins? Part I
The Military-Medical-Judicial Tyranny, featuring FUJITSU's involvement with the judiciary, the UN as a religious orginisation, the difference between Unalienable Rights and "Human Rights", and more...
Alisa and I have taken to the airwaves again in this podcast on the evil Dystopian Siamese twins Justice Bill and the Public Health Bill consultation. To accompany this video recorded a couple of weeks ago and first uploaded on Rumble, we have produced a very detailed list of references and links for this substack in the show notes below.
We also examine the difference between God given unalienable rights v UN made European Convention on Human Right ‘ECHR’ alienable and revocable 'Human Rights' and explain in detail that your rights do not come from man-made written instruments.
Alisa explains further:
Ireland at the heart of the distinction between alienable and unalienable rights
The distinction between alienable and unalienable rights was introduced by the founding father and key figure of Scottish Enlightenment, influential teacher, philosopher and writer Francis Hutcheson (1694 – 1746) born at Drumalig in the parish of Saintfield, County Down Ireland - the son of a Presbyterian minister.
Francis Hutcheson (1696 - 1746)
Francis Hutcheson’s association of "unalienable rights" with the right to resist oppressive government led him to be "probably the most influential and respected moral philosopher in America in the eighteenth century" and his influence can be seen within the anti-slavery movement, American Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and much more:
"For wherever any Invasion is made upon unalienable Rights, there must arise either a perfect, or external Right to Resistance. ... Unalienable Rights are essential Limitations in all Governments." (Francis Hutcheson 1725 Ireland)
The attempted Invasion made upon our God-given Unalienable Rights by Politicians, the Judiciary, the officers within the Department of Health and the Department of Justice, crown servants, individuals within the Legal Industrial Complex, etcetera by way of the UNITED NATIONS “Human Rights”
From our own first-hand experience within the utterly corrupt court system, those working within the Legal Industrial Complex are always pushing the United Nation’s ‘Human Rights’, but not for the benefit of you and me and certainly not for the benefit of our children.
UN ‘Human Rights’: - ‘The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’, better known as the ‘European Convention on Human Rights’ commonly known as ‘ECHR’ was signed in 1950 by ‘Anthony Eden’ acting as the ‘authorised representative’ for the ‘Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland’
The text of the ECHR includes, but is not limited to:
“The governments signatory hereto, being members of the Council of Europe,
Considering the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10th December 1948; …
Being resolved, as the governments of European countries which are like-minded and have a common heritage of political traditions, ideals, freedom and the rule of law, to take the first steps for the collective enforcement [one world government?] of certain of the rights stated in the [UN’s] Universal Declaration, …” [emphasis added]
In the above podcast, we provide material evidence of the qualified nature of the UN’s ECHR “Human Rights” that can be and are revoked on a judge’s whim (as in this example) and or any other crown servants. I have broken down some components of this case in order to pull back the curtain and expose what we are dealing with:
A Father v A Mother and In the matter of Finn (a minor) specific issue: vaccination
This judgement of His Majesty’s court was “delivered” by “Keegan J (delivering the judgment of the court)” in layman’s terms that is a reference to Siobhán Roisín Keegan (neé O’Hagan) who was at that time was acting as a Justice (Judge) at HIS MAJESTY’S HIGH COURT at the ROYAL COURTS OF INJUSTICE located in Belfast.
Siobhan Roisín (neé O’Hagan) Keegan - The Lady Chief Justice.
Since then, Siobhán has received a massive and meteoric promotion that has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that she is a woman and attended a Catholic Grammar school (😉). As part of Siobhán’s meteoric promotion as a judicial crown servant, her title now is now: the Right Honourable* Dame Commander of the Order of the British Empire Siobhán Roisín (neé O’Hagan) Keegan the Lady Chief Justice and President of the Courts of Northern Ireland.
*the phrase ‘Right Honourable’ signifies a member of HIS-MAJESTY’S-MOST-HONOURABLE-PRIVY-COUNCIL and one who has taken the PRIVY COUCIL OATH – this is the oath that we have spoken about in other pod casts https://privycouncil.independent.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Privy-Counsellors-Oath-2023.pdf.
So like Toto in the Wizard of Oz, let’s pull back the curtain and go into detail of Siobhán’s alleged “judgement” on behalf of the court in A Father v A Mother and In the matter of Finn (a minor) specific issue: vaccination:
“Her [the mothers] objections in relation to the contents of vaccines are not sustainable based on the medical opinion. Her objections on the basis of there being a compensation scheme* are not well founded as the fact of this does not mean that the vaccinations are unsafe per se.”
* The UK Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme (VDPS) is a one-off tax-free payment of £120,000 provided to individuals by HM-Government who are severely disabled [60%] as a result of vaccination against certain diseases https://www.gov.uk/vaccine-damage-payment
“Advice from the Chief Medical Officer in Northern Ireland”
“[25] In response to a request from the Official Solicitor at the earlier stages of this case, [Dr Michael Oliver McBride] the Chief Medical Officer of Northern Ireland set out the policy in Northern Ireland on childhood vaccines prior to pre-school and school. …”
The worm himself - Dr Michael McBride
Article 8 Right of Family Life ECHR:
“[41] …Article 8 is, however, a qualified right and so an interference can be justified in this case for the legitimate purpose of the protection of health.
The Article 8 rights of the child must also be engaged because a vaccination is an intrusive intervention which affects the private life of the child. This is easily justified within a public health sphere. “
[Article 9: Freedom of thought, belief and religion ECHR]
“[45] As I [Siobhan Roisin Keegan acting as a ‘judge’] have said, I [and not a jury] am not convinced that Article 9 applies.
[46 IX] I [Siobhan Roisin Keegan acting as a ‘judge’] have taken into account the views of the Official Solicitor who supports vaccination for Finn. Helpfully, she has also put forward the views of the [Dr Michael Oliver McBride] Chief Medical Officer which is in support of vaccination of children in Northern Ireland.” [emphasis added]
[47] In light of the above, I [Siobhan Roisin Keegan acting as a ‘judge’] am clearly of the view that vaccination is an appropriate course for this young child. I will make an Article 8 Specific Issue Order. [emphasis added]
The deployment of the judicial tyranny via the Dystopian Siamese twins - Justice Bill and Public Health Bill - is clearly a money making exercise and income generator for the legal industrial complex.
As it has been reported that legal aid payments have increased by a staggering 40% to £110m in Northern Ireland since the start of Operation COVID-19. This almost a decade after it was reported that N Ireland had the most expensive legal aid service in the world!
26 June 2024 - The Department of Justice paid out more than £110m in legal aid last year — an increase of nearly 40% since 2019. Legal aid bill leaps from £81m 2019 to more than £110m. The figure was released in response to an Assembly question from Fermanagh and South Tyrone UUP MLA Tom Elliott.
There is no transparency as top legal aid earners no longer published this followed public scrutiny of these figures. This information is of the utmost public interest The Legal Services Agency, part of the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, has not published details payments made to solicitor firms and individual barristers for four years.
Many members of the judiciary have been awarded large sums from legal aid fees. Let us take a closer look at the Lady-Chief-Justice-of-Northern-Ireland and the President-of-the-Courts-of-Northern-Ireland –
Before Siobhan Roisín was sworn in as a High Court judge in 2015 at a salary of £177,988.00, she acted as a barrister-at law & Queen’s Counsel ‘QC’, primarily in the family courts. As widely reported, for the three (3) financial years from March 2012 to 2015, Siobhan Roisín Keegan earned a staggering:
£1,445,214.00 million from legal aid alone – this does not include her earnings from her private work as a barrister for those 3 financial years. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siobhan_Keegan
Banditos?
Siobhan Roisín Keegan was the fourth (4th) highest earning barrister in Northern Ireland in terms of legal aid averaging £481,738 a year over three (3) financial years. Why are the top legal aid earners no longer name publically?
FUJITSU – Follow the Money….
Anne and I in the video, go into detail regarding - FUJITSU, the company behind the flawed IT system ‘HORIZON’ at the centre of the Post Office Scandal is also connected to the Judiciary of Northern Ireland, the Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunal Service, the Department of Justice, the Department of Health, the Police Service of Northern Ireland, the Department of Finance, the Department of Education, the Education Authority, the Northern Ireland Civil Service, the Library Service, etcetera.
The neverending revelation of the corruption of the entire court system, the judiciary, criminal justice system, public prosecutors, the PSNI just went up a gear…
Northern Ireland public bodies have spent well over 1 Billion in the last 24 years on contracts involving FUJITSU the corporation behind the flawed IT system ‘HORIZON’ at the centre of the Post Office Scandal.
Fujitsu, the company behind the flawed IT system ‘HORIZON’ at the centre of the Post Office Scandal that saw hundreds of postmasters and postmistresses wrongly convicted of fraud, provides services for the Judiciary of Northern Ireland, the entire court system through the Northern Ireland Courts and Tribunal Service’s FUJITSU ‘ICOS’ system, the entire criminal justice system through FUJITSU’s ‘CAUSEWAY’ that includes the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland, a corporation sole; DPP appointed public prosecutors; the Police Service of Northern Ireland, etc.
This is one of the most eggregious miscarriages of justice to date and we are just at the tip of the iceberg. Anne and I discuss this in great detail and I would encourage readers and viewers to please check out our extensive links section.
We have seen already FUJITSU case studies on the Northern Ireland Court Service start to be scrubbed from the internet – luckily here is one that we obtained before it was thrown down the Memory Hole. Please download and save this evidence.
Fujitsu Case Study: Northern Ireland Court Service: Enabling a modern approach to Justice Services
Fujitsu Case Study On Northern Ireland Courts And Tribunal Service Northern Ireland
“Our services are now designed around customer need [not legislation or statute law]…without ICOS [Fujitsu’s Integrated Computer Operating System] we simply could not have modernised admin of justice”
Anne and I will provide more updates and analysis regarding the Public Health Bill and the Justice Bill in Part II…
Is mise le meas - Yours in pure truth
All rights reserved.
27 October 2024
Standard Disclaimer applies
Links & References
1. Paul Frew, MLA Justice Bill 2nd Reading and Naomi Long, MLA Minister of Justice’s missing text. Friday 4 October 2024:
2. UN ‘Human Rights’: - ‘The Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’, better known as the ‘European Convention on Human Rights ECHR’ singed in 1950 by ‘Anthony Eden’ acting as the authorised representative for the ‘Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland’
The text of the ECHR includes, but is not limited to:
“The governments signatory hereto, being members of the Council of Europe, Considering the Universal Declaration of Human Rights proclaimed by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 10th December 1948; …
Being resolved, as the governments of European countries which are like-minded and have a common heritage of political traditions, ideals, freedom and the rule of law, to take the first steps for the collective enforcement [one world government?]of certain of the rights stated in the [UN’s] Universal Declaration, …” [emphasis added]
3. Francis Hutcheson (1694 – 1746) - founding father and key figure of Scottish Enlightenment. The distinction between alienable and unalienable rights was introduced by the influential teacher, philosopher and writer Francis Hutcheson born at Drumalig in the parish of Saintfield, County Down Ireland. He was the "son of a Presbyterian minister of Ulster-Scottish stock, who was born in Ireland".
Francis Hutcheson’s association of "unalienable rights" with the right to resist oppressive government led him to be "probably the most influential and respected moral philosopher in America in the eighteenth century" and his influence can be seen within the American Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and much more:
"For wherever any Invasion is made upon unalienable Rights, there must arise either a perfect, or external Right to Resistance. ... Unalienable Rights are essential Limitations in all Governments." (1725)
New Discourses hosted by James Lindsay premiered on 22 Apr 2024
“The United Nations is a religious organization, and the religion behind it is a cult. More specifically, it [UN] is a theosophical cult based on an "evolutionary" vision for mankind that it wants to control.”
5. Theosophy -
“Theosophy is a religious and philosophical system established … in the late 19th century. Founded primarily by Russian mystic and spiritualist Helena Blavatsky, (Madame Blavatsky) and based largely on her writings, it draws heavily from both older European philosophies such as Gnosticism and Neoplatonism and Indian religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism.”
7. Lucifer and Theosophy II – ‘Lucifer Publishing Company’ is renamed to the ‘Lucis Trust’ …”the great teacher H.P. Blavatsky, for whom they had enormous respect, sought to elicit a deeper understanding of the sacrifice made by Lucifer. Alice and Foster Bailey were serious students and teachers of Theosophy, a spiritual tradition which views Lucifer as one of the solar Angels, those advanced Beings Who Theosophy says descended (thus “the fall”) from Venus to our planet eons ago to bring the principle of mind to what was then animal-man. In the theosophical perspective, the descent of these solar Angels was not a fall into sin or disgrace but rather an act of great sacrifice, as is suggested in the name “Lucifer” which means light-bearer.” [emphasis added] https://www.lucistrust.org/arcane_school/talks_and_articles/the_esoteric_meaning_lucifer
8. The Vice of Kings: How Socialism, Occultism, and the Sexual Revolutions Engineered a Culture of Abuse.
By Jasun Horsley London 2019
“The Vice of Kings maps the shadowy intersection between progressive politics, psychosexual research, intelligence programs, behaviour modification, occult ritual and philosophy, and organised child abuse, to reveal long-term social and cultural engineering goals throughout the twentieth and twenty-first centuries.”
Theosophy pages 35-36, 109.
9. Theosophy and the Social Engineering of a New World Order: The Wars of the Social Engineers, Part 1
During the first three years of writing at RTE [Rounding the Earth], I found myself reading and researching deeper and deeper into the web of connections surrounding Theosophy and related occult groups. The connections to major events in world history, global organizations, military intelligence, and mafia are so vast that the effort now subsumes the larger project of Rounding the Earth.
Delivered 30 July 2020 , Keegan J (delivering the judgment of the court) =
Siobhan Roisin Keegan acting as a High Court Judge she is now Lady Chief Justice
“Her [the mothers] objections in relation to the contents of vaccines are not sustainable based on the medical opinion. Her objections on the basis of there being a compensation scheme* are not well founded as the fact of this does not mean that the vaccinations are unsafe per se.”
“Advice from the Chief Medical Officer in Northern Ireland”
“[25] In response to a request from the Official Solicitor at the earlier stages of this case, [Dr Michael Oliver McBride] the Chief Medical Officer of Northern Ireland set out the policy in Northern Ireland on childhood vaccines prior to pre-school and school. …”
Article 8 Right of Family Life ECHR:
“[41] …Article 8 is, however, a qualified right and so an interference can be justified in this case for the legitimate purpose of the protection of health.
The Article 8 rights of the child must also be engaged because a vaccination is an intrusive intervention which affects the private life of the child. This is easily justified within a public health sphere. “
[Article 9: Freedom of thought, belief and religion ECHR]
“[45] As I [Siobhan Roisin Keegan acting as a ‘judge’] have said, I [and not a jury] am not convinced that Article 9 applies.
[46 IX] I [Siobhan Roisin Keegan acting as a ‘judge’] have taken into account the views of the Official Solicitor who supports vaccination for Finn. Helpfully, she has also put forward the views of the [Dr Michael Oliver McBride]Chief Medical Officer which is in support of vaccination of children in Northern Ireland.” [emphasis added]
[47] In light of the above, I [Siobhan Roisin Keegan acting as a ‘judge’] am clearly of the view that vaccination is an appropriate course for this young child. I will make an Article 8 Specific Issue Order. [emphasis added]
FUJITSU
14. Fujitsu Case Study: Northern Ireland Court Service: Enabling a modern approach to Justice Services
“Our services are now designed around customer need [not legislation or statute law]…without ICOS [Fujitsu’s Integrated Computer Operating System] we simply could not have modernised admin of justice”
“The bespoke ICOS application developed by Fujitsu provides comprehensive case lifestyle management from initiation through to disposal and appeal, including access to a full case history and the integrated creation and control of all documents, such as initiation procedural and evidential documents, results / court orders, warrants and notices. To manage any fees or fines, ICOS supports payments over the telephone by debit/credit card, Chip and Pin integration, and the electronic processing of credit transfers and is also fully integrated with the Account system and performs an automatic bank reconciliation.”
ICOS is supported by three new centres of excellence [?] for Customer Services (payments, warrants and queries) Juror Management and Civil Case Processing, but can be accessed by other authorised court users and judiciary at all venues….
Fujitsu Services has won an 80pc to 90pc share of the £35m sterling Causeway Programme that will revolutionise interaction and administration between the various criminal justice organisations across Northern Ireland (NI).
The contract will include the design, implementation and operation of the IT services needed to support the Causeway Programme. The project is understood to be based on Microsoft technology. Microsoft’s SQL Server will be used to enable unstructured data such as photos and witness statements to be share amongst the various agencies.
Fujitsu Services, which employs 400 people in Belfast, will co-ordinate specialist expertise from Hewlett-Packard (HP), Microsoft and Meridio to deliver the solution.
It has built up significant experience of the criminal justice sector, having worked with the NI Courts Service for the last four years and supplied the technology for groundbreaking projects such as the Bloody Sunday Inquiry, the Bristol Royal Infirmary and Shipman Inquiries in the UK.
18. FUJITSU website – Data led Transformation to Northern Ireland’s Criminal Justice CAUSEWAY
“In the dynamic landscape of modern criminal justice systems, the efficient flow of information among various agencies is crucial. Recognising the limitations of paper-based processes in Northern Ireland, the [Fujitsu developed] Causeway Programme emerged as a ground-breaking initiative to revolutionise the region's criminal justice system. This joint effort by six key organisations — the Public Prosecution Service, Forensic Science Northern Ireland, Police Service, Courts and Tribunals Service, Probation Board, and Prison Service …
19. On the 31st January 2024, in light of the Post Office – Fujitsu Horizon IT enquiry,
20. 2016 “DOJ - PSNI - Core IT Managed Services” The contract value range is between £15,000,000.00 and £100,000,000.00 over the full potential contract term of 7 years (this includes all potential extension options) pdf from eTenderNI
21. 24 September 2024 - Fujitsu wins spot on £600M framework [DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH for Northern Ireland] after vowing to sit out public sector:
22. 18 Mar 2021 The Northern Ireland government is paying Fujitsu up to £87m to roll over support for an Oracle HR system that dates back to 2006 in a contract awarded without competition…Department of Finance explained that its current £185m strategic partnership with Fujitsu, which initially went to tender in 2003, comes to an end on 29 March 2021. "The HR system was built for the Northern Ireland Civil Service (NICS) based on Oracle software, and was "heavily customised to align with the NICS HR policies and procedures." https://www.theregister.com/2021/03/18/northern_ireland_awards_fujitsu_deal/
23. How governments become addicted to suppliers like Fujitsu: Interest in Japanese’s firm’s public sector deals – worth $15B in the UK alone since 2012 – spikes
A legal dispute between the DHSC and the Japanese IT supplier has been raging since 2008, when Fujitsu’s £896m contract for the South of England was terminated…It was widely reported at the time that Fujitsu subsequently sought a £700m settlement from the DHSC, with the ensuring litigation battle running up tens of millions of pounds in legal costs for the NHS. Digital Health News understands that following an earlier £65m payment, the DHSC has now settled with Fujitsu for a further payment, said to be in the region of £400m.
25. How deeply is Fujitsu embedded in Government and could it lose its contracts? 2024
The Japan-based company has faced calls for it to be stripped of its Government contracts in light of the Horizon scandal. “…For example, Fujitsu was involved with the £12 billion NHS national programme for IT (NPfIT) that was largely abandoned in 2011 amid spiralling costs, technical difficulties, delays and contractual disputes.
Prior to that, the Government had terminated Fujitsu’s contract to digitise patient records in the South of England in 2008 after a dispute over changes.Fujitsu then sued the Government for £700 million, leading to a long-running lawsuit, arbitration and a significant award to the company in 2018, although the total amount remains confidential. …”
26. BBC: Fujitsu: NI officials discussing public sector contracts
Share this post